Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Results Confirmed

Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Results Confirmed

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Pulse oximeters are significantly more likely to miss low oxygen levels in Blacks than in whites, a new study confirms.

Using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry, researchers at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, did a retrospective study of adults with respiratory failure due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or COVID-19 who were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

The primary analysis focused on rates of occult hypoxemia – low arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) <= 88% on arterial blood gas despite a pulse oximetry reading in the ranges of 92% to 96%.

The rate of pre-ECMO occult hypoxemia of SaO2 <= 88% was 10.2% for 186 white patients with peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 92% to 96%; 21.5% for 51 Black patients (P=0.031); 8.6% for 70 Hispanic patients (P=0.693); and 9.2% for 65 Asian patients (P=0.820).

Black patients with respiratory failure had a statistically significantly higher risk of occult hypoxemia with an odds ratio of 2.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 5.92) compared to white patients, Dr. Valeria Valbuena and colleagues report in the journal CHEST.

The risk of occult hypoxemia for Hispanic and Asian patients was no different to that of white patients.

In a secondary analysis of patients with SaO2 <= 88% despite SpO2 >96%, Black patients had over three times the odds compared with white patients (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.12 to 11.10).

The current findings support and extend an earlier study by the U-M team involving patients receiving supplemental oxygen in which Black patients were three times more likely to have occult hypoxemia compared to white patients. (https://bit.ly/3jU8EQg)

The current study documents significant differences in the ability of current pulse oximetry devices to detect occult hypoxemia between critically ill patients of white and Black patients, they point out.

“Our findings join the body of evidence suggesting that the use of SpO2 to rule out acute hypoxia, particularly in Black patients with other concerning signs or symptoms, should be reevaluated given its diminished reliability,” the authors write.

“Also concerning is the limitation of the technology to identify clinically significant hypoxemia for Black patients at higher SpO2 levels,” they add.

“At an SpO2 range of >96%, most clinicians would be reassured about the oxygenation status of even critically ill patients with respiratory failure, but our findings indicate that reassurance may be unwarranted. Given the widespread use of pulse oximetry, a higher degree of suspicion of hypoxemia for patients of color should be considered with consideration of more frequent use of arterial blood gas examination for patients at risk until a technological fix is implemented,” they advise.

Earlier this year, three U.S. senators sent a letter to the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration requesting an expedited review of device sensitivity in patients of different races.

SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2ZIiUE7 CHEST, published online October 27, 2021.

Source: Read Full Article